MSc

MSc Global Credential Portability Practice

Make awards readable across borders—without pretending a master’s is a licence or a UN recognition stamp.

Online only

18 months48 creditsEnglish (ES/PT/HI support hubs do not change the language of assessment unless a bilingual pathway is stated)

Begin your application Explore programme

MSc Global Credential Portability Practice

Overview

Credential portability is where online universities are either honest or fraudulent. A tuition-free remote MSc with identity-checked exams is not a campus degree and must not be described as one. This programme trains people who write those descriptions: diploma supplements, grade conversions, and letters that a receiving institution can actually use. You will compare credit frameworks, sit with the politics of ‘equivalent’, and design student-facing copy that states English assessment even when the applicant’s first conversation was with a Hindi or Spanish hub. FollowLap University’s own model is on the table: global remote, no campus gate, support hubs that must not rewrite the award. No UN logo. No claim that this MSc makes you a statutory evaluator in a named country. Academic practice for people who already handle files. File work is slow and specific: diploma-supplement sentences, conversion ethics, and letters a receiving admissions tutor can use. You will compare two named systems without fake precision and you will flag where an online award is being dressed as attendance. Timezone-fair exams still produce one standard; that sentence belongs on the transcript narrative. Hubs in ES/PT/HI must not be described as the medium of the degree. Fraud and diploma-mill due diligence sit in the operations module because portability without scepticism is how mills travel.

Thirty-six credits: frameworks and honesty, online-award description, mobility operations, and a file-based capstone.

Who This Programme Is For

Registry and student-records staff in online or dual-mode providers
Admissions officers handling international online awards
Mobility and recognition advisers (non-statutory)
Quality staff writing diploma supplements

How you can study

Digital only

Study online

100% tuition-free online

Every programme can be completed fully online with zero tuition fees — study from anywhere in the world.

✦ Tuition: £0 / $0
✦ Course exams from $60 — 95% sponsorship rate
✦ Learn from anywhere · Live online seminars

Apply online →

What You Will Learn

Write an honest description of a fully online award for a receiving body
Separate hub language from assessment language in credential narratives
Compare two credit systems without fake precision
Flag licensure versus academic awards in student advice
Design a timezone-fair exam record that still reads as one standard

Curriculum

Module 1: Frameworks and honesty

Code	Course	Credits
FollowLap5601	Credit, Level, and What ‘Equivalent’ Hides Students name the methods used in this subject and apply one of them to a short case. The module is Credit, Level, and What ‘Equivalent’ Hides. Credit, Level, and What ‘Equivalent’ Hides: the core problem A worked case in Credit, Level, and What ‘Equivalent’ Hides Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3
FollowLap5602	Online Awards versus Campus Attendance Myths Students compare two cases and explain why the outcomes differed. The module is Online Awards versus Campus Attendance Myths. Online Awards versus Campus Attendance Myths: the core problem A worked case in Online Awards versus Campus Attendance Myths Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3
FollowLap5603	GPA, Percentage, and Conversion Ethics Students produce a professional artefact, with sources and a review of its weaknesses. The module is GPA, Percentage, and Conversion Ethics. GPA, Percentage, and Conversion Ethics: the core problem A worked case in GPA, Percentage, and Conversion Ethics Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3
FollowLap5604	Identity-Checked Assessment as Evidence Students complete a supervised project and defend the method and the result. The module is Identity-Checked Assessment as Evidence. Identity-Checked Assessment as Evidence: the core problem A worked case in Identity-Checked Assessment as Evidence Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3

Module 2: Describing digital HE

Code	Course	Credits
FollowLap5605	Diploma Supplement Literacy Students name the methods used in this subject and apply one of them to a short case. The module is Diploma Supplement Literacy. Diploma Supplement Literacy: the core problem A worked case in Diploma Supplement Literacy Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3
FollowLap5606	Timezone and Mode on the Transcript Students compare two cases and explain why the outcomes differed. The module is Timezone and Mode on the Transcript. Timezone and Mode on the Transcript: the core problem A worked case in Timezone and Mode on the Transcript Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3
FollowLap5607	ES/PT/HI Hubs in Public Credential Copy Students produce a professional artefact, with sources and a review of its weaknesses. The module is ES/PT/HI Hubs in Public Credential Copy. ES/PT/HI Hubs in Public Credential Copy: the core problem A worked case in ES/PT/HI Hubs in Public Credential Copy Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3
FollowLap5608	Non-Licensure Sentences that Survive Legal Review Students complete a supervised project and defend the method and the result. The module is Non-Licensure Sentences that Survive Legal Review. Non-Licensure Sentences that Survive Legal Review: the core problem A worked case in Non-Licensure Sentences that Survive Legal Review Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3

Module 3: Mobility operations

Code	Course	Credits
FollowLap5609	Receiving-Body Correspondence Students name the methods used in this subject and apply one of them to a short case. The module is Receiving-Body Correspondence. Receiving-Body Correspondence: the core problem A worked case in Receiving-Body Correspondence Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3
FollowLap5610	Fraud, Diploma Mills, and Online-Provider Due Diligence Students compare two cases and explain why the outcomes differed. The module is Fraud, Diploma Mills, and Online-Provider Due Diligence. Fraud, Diploma Mills, and Online-Provider Due Diligence: the core problem A worked case in Fraud, Diploma Mills, and Online-Provider Due Diligence Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3
FollowLap5611	Student Advice without Practising Immigration Law Students produce a professional artefact, with sources and a review of its weaknesses. The module is Student Advice without Practising Immigration Law. Student Advice without Practising Immigration Law: the core problem A worked case in Student Advice without Practising Immigration Law Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3
FollowLap5612	Case Conference Methods Students complete a supervised project and defend the method and the result. The module is Case Conference Methods. Case Conference Methods: the core problem A worked case in Case Conference Methods Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3

Module 4: Capstone

Code	Course	Credits
FollowLap5613	Redacted File Analysis Students name the methods used in this subject and apply one of them to a short case. The module is Redacted File Analysis. Redacted File Analysis: the core problem A worked case in Redacted File Analysis Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3
FollowLap5614	Comparative Systems Essay with Named Sources Students compare two cases and explain why the outcomes differed. The module is Comparative Systems Essay with Named Sources. Comparative Systems Essay with Named Sources: the core problem A worked case in Comparative Systems Essay with Named Sources Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3
FollowLap5615	Writing for Admissions Committees Students produce a professional artefact, with sources and a review of its weaknesses. The module is Writing for Admissions Committees. Writing for Admissions Committees: the core problem A worked case in Writing for Admissions Committees Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3
FollowLap5616	Capstone: Portability File and Honest Narrative Students complete a supervised project and defend the method and the result. The module is Capstone: Portability File and Honest Narrative. Capstone: Portability File and Honest Narrative: the core problem A worked case in Capstone: Portability File and Honest Narrative Evidence, sources, and limits An assessed task a reviewer can mark	3

Career Paths

Credential evaluation coordinator (academic training)
Registry recognition specialist
Admissions international officer
Diploma supplement author
Quality officer (online awards)

Programme Highlights

Honesty about online versus campus
No UN recognition stamp
Hub-language traps
File-based capstones
Tuition-free online

Assessment

Modules are assessed through a published mix of coursework, applied projects, and examinations. Exam windows are announced in advance so students in other time zones are not forced into overnight sittings. Alternative arrangements are available where documented.

Admission requirements

Academic entry

Bachelor's degree from a recognised institution (minimum 2:2 / GPA 2.5/4.0 or equivalent national scale)
Identity document for remote identity-checked assessment enrolment
Preferred: work in registry, admissions, recognition, or quality

English language

English proficiency: IELTS 5.5, TOEFL 46, or equivalent (waived for prior English-medium study). Spanish, Portuguese, or Hindi support hubs do not replace the language of assessment unless the programme explicitly offers a bilingual assessment pathway.

Documents

Statement of Purpose (500 words minimum) stating goals, professional context, and fit
Two academic or professional references with verifiable contact details
CV or résumé covering education and relevant work
Official transcripts (digital copies accepted at application; certified copies before award)

Programme questions

How long is the MSc Global Credential Portability Practice?

The published duration is 18 months. Teaching language: English (ES/PT/HI support hubs do not change the language of assessment unless a bilingual pathway is stated). Actual time-to-complete depends on mode and any recognised prior learning.

Can I study this from my country?

This is a fully online award. You study from your country. No student visa and no campus relocation are required.

What does it cost?

Degree tuition for this award is published as £0 / tuition-free on the online pathway. Examination or administrative fees may apply at checkout — never an annual tuition invoice. Check the Fees page for any extras.

What are the entry requirements?

Requirements are grouped on this page (academic, English, documents). Equivalent qualifications are considered. English may be waived after prior English-medium study.

How is the programme assessed?

Assessment is typically a mix of coursework, projects, and examinations. Doctoral awards include a thesis or dissertation and an oral examination. Details sit in the programme specification and module outlines.

Will this award be recognised where I live?

Recognition of the award for local employment, professional licence, or ministry attestation is decided by your employer or regulator. FollowLap University publishes verification pages for certificates. We do not claim automatic equivalence in every country.

How do I apply?

Start an application on this website. Progress is saved from the first step. Admissions: admissions@followlap.com.

Recognised & Accredited

Ready to begin?MSc Global Credential Portability Practice

Apply now